Prince Harry and Prince William’s feud intensified when the Duke of Sussex began dating Meghan Markle. The Prince of Wales questioned the strength of their romance early into their relationship, leaving Harry offended.
Prince Harry and Prince William argued over Meghan Markle’s job.
William was worried that Meghan’s line of work would make it difficult for her to join the British monarchy.
“She’s an actress, after all, Harold. Anything can happen,” Harry claimed William said in his memoir, Spare. Harry admitted he was “a bit hurt” by his sibling’s stance.
William later noted that there would be “a host of difficulties I could expect if I hooked up with an ‘American actress.’”
However, the veteran thinks William “always managed to make” the Suits star’s job “sound like a ‘convicted felon.’”
Prince William offended Prince Harry after he minimized Meghan Markle as just an actress.
In the docuseries Harry & Meghan, the duke shared that his loved ones were initially fond of his then-girlfriend.
“I remember my family first meeting her and being incredibly impressed,” Harry said. “Some of them didn’t quite know what to do with themselves. Because, I think, they were surprised. They were surprised that a ginger could land such a beautiful woman and such an intelligent woman.”
“But the fact I was dating an American actress was probably what clouded their judgment more than anything else at the beginning,” he added. “‘Oh, she’s an American actress; this won’t last.’”
Meghan Markle the Outcast: Prince William Once Treated Duchess of Sussex Like She Was a ‘Convicted Felon’
Meghan Markle Will Have a ‘Lead Role’ in Ending Prince Harry and Prince William’s Yearslong Feud
Prince William Believes Prince Harry’s Memoir and Constant Interviews Are a ‘Real Headache’
Although the royals were once excited about Meghan joining The Firm, things slowly took a turn for the worse and escalated after the Sussexes’ 2020 Megxit scandal.
In 2021, the couple had an explosive tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey, and the former blogger discussed her struggle to assimilate into royal life.
“There’s the family, and then there’s the people that are running the institution. Those are two separate things,” she explained. “And it’s important to be able to compartmentalize that, because the Queen, for example, has always been wonderful to me.”
“I mean, we had one of our first joint engagements together,” she added.
Meghan Markle claimed she lost her independence once marrying Prince Harry.
The duchess later alluded to her public feud with Kate Middleton being fueled by the press.
“I think, a lot of it, that was fed into by the media,” the mom-of-two shared. “And I would hope that she would have wanted that corrected, and maybe in the same way that the Palace wouldn’t let anybody else.”
Meghan alleged that the palace wouldn’t allow Kate to address any of the rumors surrounding their dynamic.
“Negate it, they wouldn’t let her, because she’s a good person,” she added. “And I think so much of what I have seen play out is this idea of polarity, where if you love me, you don’t have to hate her. And if you love her, you don’t need to hate me.”
Meghaп Markle’s ex-hυsbaпd LEAKS her ‘horrific’ past amid ‘ridicυloυs’ claims aboυt self-made leadiпg lady
Meghan Markle had her first husband agree to a “pregnancy contract” to ensure she had every luxury during pregnancy, a close friend revealed to the source. The then-rising actress was so concerned about the challenges of pregnancy and maintaining her celebrity figure that she demanded Trevor Engelson pay for a personal trainer and a nutritionist if they conceived. Additionally, she arranged for childcare details, ensuring Engelson would cover the cost of a паппу.
This revelation comes just days after Meghan and Prince Harry announced they were expecting their first child, adding a new layer to the phrase “too posh to push.”
At the time of the agreement, which occurred a few years after Meghan’s 2011 wedding to Engelson, she was achieving success with the TV series “Suits.” The friend, once close to Meghan, mentioned that the Duchess was focused on avoiding weight gain due to her career and the family tendency towards a heavier body type. Meghan was particularly concerned about her face showing any weight gain, prompting her to insist on having a personal trainer and a nutritionist during and after pregnancу.
Pregnancy contracts, increasingly popular in the US and especially in Los Angeles, typically cover parental responsibilities and household duties after childbirth. However, Meghan’s main focus was on health and weight management. The agreement, which Meghan wrote herself, was informal but taken very seriously by her. Engelson, understanding Meghan’s concerns about her image and her insecurity about her body, complied without objection.
Meghan and Engelson, who met in 2004 and married in 2011, saw their relationship strain as Meghan filmed “Suits” in Toronto while Engelson remained in Los Angeles. They separated in the summer of 2013 and divorced in 2014 citing “irreconcilable differences.” Engelson has since remarried, tying the knot with nutritionist Tracey Kurland in a low-key ceremony in October.
Now part of the Royal Family, Meghan’s image is carefully managed, and she enjoys every luxury. A friend noted that Meghan loves being pampered and is likely thrilled about impending motherhood. She aims to balance being a symbol of feminism and empowerment with her roles as a mother and a royal.
Despite her excitement, Meghan’s desire for control and her image-conscious nature may cause some insecurity about the future. Her friend hopes Prince Harry is ready to support her through this new chapter, as Meghan sets high standards for him, partly due to her strained relationship with her father. Meghan and Harry are currently on a royal tour in Fiji, where Harry expressed his hope for their first child to be a girl during a toast at a state dinner.
THE LAST CLUE REVEALED: There was no Lilibet Diana, the child that appeared was Diana Mary with the same date of birth but the parents’ identities were two different names.
Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor: The Controversy of Her Existence
The British royal family has long been a subject of intense public fascination, with every aspect of their lives scrutinized by media and fans alike. Recently, a new and controversial claim has emerged, raising questions about the existence of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s daughter, Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor. According to a source from Los Angeles, California, who works for the County Registrar’s Office, no child named Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor was born in California. Instead, records indicate a child named Diana Mary Mountbatten-Windsor born on the same date, but to different parents. This revelation has sparked widespread speculation and debate about the authenticity of the couple’s claims and the implications for the royal family.
The source, who chose to remain anonymous, has reportedly sent all pertinent legal documents to the offices of Prince William and King Charles, as well as to UK Home Office and the UK Security Agency. These documents allegedly confirm that Harry and Meghan were in the process of adopting a baby girl. However, due to various complications, the biological mother decided to keep her daughter, leaving Harry and Meghan without the child they intended to adopt.
This information, if verified, could have significant repercussions for the royal couple. Public records not matching the details provided by Harry and Meghan would raise questions about their transparency and honesty. Furthermore, the situation underscores the challenges and complexities of adoption, especially for high-profile individuals whose lives are under constant scrutiny.
Compounding the controversy are allegations that the couple has been using images of other people’s children to represent Lilibet in public. One particularly contentious claim is that a photograph from the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee, purportedly showing Lilibet, is actually of Hartford Schroeder Clark, the daughter of Stassi Schroeder and Beau Clark. If true, this would not only mislead the public but also involve another family in the royal drama, potentially without their consent.
The motives behind such actions, if they indeed occurred, remain unclear. Some speculate that Harry and Meghan may have felt immense pressure to present a complete family unit to the public, leading them to make questionable decisions. Others suggest that the couple might have been attempting to protect their child’s privacy by using decoy images, a practice not unheard of among celebrities. However, the ethical implications of involving an innocent child in such a deception are significant and warrant serious consideration.
The revelation about the alleged existence of Diana Mary Mountbatten-Windsor adds another layer of complexity. If this child is indeed the one Harry and Meghan intended to adopt, questions arise about the circumstances that led to the biological mother retaining custody. Adoption processes can be fraught with legal and emotional challenges, and it is not uncommon for plans to change. However, the high-profile nature of this case amplifies the stakes and public interest.
It is essential to approach these claims with caution and await further verification. The royal family and Harry and Meghan have yet to respond publicly to these allegations, and it is possible that additional information will clarify the situation. Until then, the speculation and rumors will likely continue, fueled by a mix of curiosity and skepticism.
In the broader context, this controversy highlights the intense public scrutiny faced by the British royal family and the difficulties of maintaining privacy and authenticity in the modern age. For Harry and Meghan, who have frequently expressed their desire for a more private life away from the relentless media attention, this situation represents a significant challenge. Balancing public interest with personal boundaries is a delicate act, and any missteps can lead to widespread criticism and speculation.
As the story develops, it will be crucial to consider the perspectives and rights of all parties involved, particularly the children who are unwittingly drawn into the public eye. The truth about Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor’s existence, or lack thereof, may ultimately reveal deeper insights into the complexities of modern royal life and the pressures faced by those within it.
