Meghan Markle has reportedly been left upset over the “unfair criticism” of her new lifestyle brand, American Riviera Orchard, according to a royal expert.
The Duchess of Sussex, 42, unveiled her new business venture in March with an Instagram post teasing its impending launch.
And after the initial buzz over her new project died down, the “Suits” alum was reportedly reduced to tears over the lackluster reception her announcement had generated.
Meghan Markle has reportedly been left upset over the “unfair criticism” of her new lifestyle brand, according to a royal expert.Getty Images for Project Healthy Minds
“The one fly in the ointment is Meghan’s new internet brand, America Riviera Orchard. Meghan was in tears when the brand launched and her new jam was widely mocked for being expensive and nothing special,” royal author Tom Quinn told The Mirror.
“She has reached the point now where she thinks that anything and everything she does will be unfairly criticized. Like her husband, she feels that people are unfairly picking on her – she cannot understand why people don’t admire her work.”
Quinn claimed that the mom of two was not expecting to receive any criticism after unveiling the brand’s first product — strawberry jam — last month.
“She is especially sensitive about any criticism of her luxurious lifestyle in the US – from her point of view this is something to be admired not criticized,” he added.
The Post has reached out to Markle’s reps for comment.
While products from her new brand are not available for purchase yet, Markle sent out jars of strawberry jam to an exclusive group of celebs last month.
Markle sent out jars of strawberry jam to an exclusive group of celebs last month.Kris Jenner/ Instagram
The former actress shipped out lemon-filled gift baskets containing fresh fruit jam to 50 of her friends, many of them being high-profile figures.
According to those close to Markle, the brand’s name is a sweet nod to Santa Barbara, Calif., as it has been nicknamed the “American Riviera” for over a century.
The Duchess of Sussex, 42, unveiled her new business venture in March.Instagram/@americanrivieraorchard
The location is also where she and her husband reside with their two children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.
Additionally, a trademark application reveals the brand plans to sell tableware, drinkware, decanters, kitchen linens and edible treats such as jellies, jams, marmalade and spreads.
Markle was not expecting to receive any criticism after unveiling the brand’s first product last month, according to Quinn.Getty Images
The trademark application is awaiting examination and is seeking approval for cookbooks.
It was reported that the mom of two could be looking to make a whopping seven-figure sum within the first year of launching the brand.
Palace’s Final Tactic: “Seize all assets!” Buckingham Palace Aims to Defeat Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
Buckingham Palace has had its fill of the Sussex circus. That’s right—looks like the Royals have decided to play a game of “ignore the problem and hope it goes away” with Harry and Meghan. Prince Harry and Meghan decided a few years ago that royal life wasn’t for them.
Fair enough; who hasn’t dreamed of quitting their job and moving to California? But here’s the twist—they wanted to keep their royal titles while ditching the responsibilities. It’s like quitting your job at McDonald’s but still expecting free Big Macs for life.
And boy, have they been busy! Harry dropped a book called *Spare*, which, let’s be honest, should have been titled “Spill the Tea: Royal Edition.” Suddenly, everyone’s dirty laundry is on display for all to see. It’s like a real-life episode of *The Crown*, but with more avocado toast and less epic battle scenes.
Here’s where it gets really interesting. The royal family, known for their stiff upper lips and ability to weather any storm—be it beheadings or Nazi sympathizers—seem to have decided that silence is their new weapon of choice. And let me tell you, it’s proving to be more effective than any strongly worded letter.
First up, Lilibet’s birthday. When I was a kid, not getting a birthday shoutout from my grandparents would have been a meltdown-worthy event. But for the Royals? Crickets. It’s as if Lilibet’s birthday fell into a royal black hole. And it’s not just Lilibet; Archie’s birthday? Same deal. Meghan’s birthday? Nada. It’s like the royal family has collectively decided to hit the mute button on all things Sussex. Talk about a family feud!
Now, some might argue that King Charles is desperate to maintain a relationship with his grandkids. Gossip magazines say so, but actions speak louder than words. And right now, the royal actions are screaming, “We’re done with your drama.
This place is like the royal version of summer camp. Everyone goes, probably roasting marshmallows over a solid gold fire pit and making daisy chains out of priceless jewels. Okay, maybe not, but you get the idea. It’s a big deal. And guess who’s not invited to the royal summer shindig? Yep, you guessed it—Harry and Meghan. Harry used to call Balmoral “paradise,” but it seems the luster wore off somewhere between leaving the royal family and dishing out family secrets.
And here’s where it gets even juicier. Remember Frogmore Cottage, the place Harry and Meghan renovated to the tune of millions in taxpayer pounds? Well, they’ve been given the royal boot from there too. Now, in a move shadier than a forest on a cloudy day, King Charles is reportedly trying to move Prince Andrew in. It’s like King Charles is saying, “You don’t want it? Fine, I’ll give it to the other problem child.” It’s the royal equivalent of your parents giving your room to your annoying little brother after you move out for college.
But what really gets me is this: all this drama, all this back and forth, is like watching the world’s most expensive, most public family therapy session. And we’re all here for it, eating it up like the last piece of Victoria sponge at a royal party.
What’s really going on here? Is this just a family squabble that’s gotten way out of hand, or is it something deeper? On one side, we have Harry and Meghan, who claim they left because of racism, mental health issues, and lack of support. Those are serious allegations. On the other side, we have the royal family, taking the “if you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all” approach to a new level. They’re ghosting Harry and Meghan harder than a Tinder date who said they’d call but never did.
Caught in the middle are the kids, Archie and Lilibet, who are probably just wondering why they can’t visit their cousins and play with the corgis. It’s like they’re the royal version of kids caught in a messy divorce.
OMG! Harry CUT OUT Of Great Grandmother Will At Last Minute By King After Traitor Dishonored Queen.
OMG! Harry CUT OUT Of Great Grandmother Will At Last Minute By King After Traitor Dishonored Queen
King Charles III has made a controversial decision to deny Prince Harry a £7 million inheritance from his great-grandmother, the Queen Mother, on Harry’s 40th birthday.
This decision, linked to Harry’s departure from royal duties and his public criticism of the monarchy, has further strained the already tense relationship between father and son and has raised significant questions about the future dynamics of the British royal family.
The inheritance, which was meant to honor Prince Harry’s connection to the Queen Mother, has now become a focal point in the ongoing family discord. The denial of this substantial sum reflects the broader struggles within the royal family regarding public perception and internal relationships.
King Charles’s decision appears to be a direct response to Harry’s departure from his royal responsibilities and his vocal criticisms of the monarchy. This situation echoes past royal disputes, notably the abdication crisis of Edward VII, highlighting how historical patterns often repeat themselves within the royal family.
The Queen Mother, who was known for her staunch loyalty to the crown and her close relationship with Harry, would likely have been disappointed by the current turn of events, which underscores the clash between traditional royal values and contemporary royal life.
Charles’s actions send a clear message to Harry and Meghan, signaling the monarchy’s stance on limiting public criticism. This calculated move raises concerns about the potential long-term impact on family dynamics. According to royal historian Dr. Samantha Vaughn, Charles is asserting his authority and addressing the consequences of Harry’s public critiques, which underscores the royal family’s boundaries and expectations.
However, commentator Emily Andrews warns that denying Harry his inheritance may further alienate him from the family, potentially deepening their already fragile relationship. This decision could have significant implications for the royal family’s unity and public image.
The monarchy is facing increasing challenges in maintaining its relevance and securing public support amid evolving societal dynamics. Observers question whether the royal family can adapt and navigate these complexities while preserving its traditional values and public standing. The recent developments underscore the difficulties King Charles III faces as he attempts to balance family relationships with the demands of modern monarchy
