Recent rumors have ignited a firestorm of controversy surrounding Meghan Markle and a piece of jewelry once lent to her by the late Queen Elizabeth II. Allegedly, Markle misplaced a bracelet, a gracious loan from the Queen, sparking debates about her trustworthiness and her relationship with the royal family.
The controversy began with whispers that Meghan, known for her lavish wardrobe and love of accessories, had somehow lost the bracelet. Sources close to the royals hinted that Meghan’s handling of royal jewelry has been a point of contention for some time. The bracelet, which symbolized a gesture of trust and inclusion from the Queen, reportedly vanished under questionable circumstances, leading critics to suggest that Meghan might have been careless—or worse, dishonest.
Adding fuel to the fire, Meghan allegedly told one of the Queen’s aides, Miss Angela Kelly, that the bracelet was a gift rather than a loan. This supposed misrepresentation infuriated the Queen, who, according to insiders, decided to cut off Meghan’s access to royal jewelry altogether. This move was seen as a significant reprimand, signaling the Queen’s deep frustration with Meghan’s behavior.
The bracelet incident isn’t the only jewelry-related controversy linked to Meghan. Before her marriage, there were already murmurs about the authenticity of the tiara she wore, with some speculating that it might not have contained real diamonds. These rumors have spiraled into more outlandish claims, including the idea that replicas of tiaras could be in circulation, though these allegations remain unverified.
Meghan’s supposed mishandling of royal jewelry has led to further speculation. Reports suggest that even during her official royal duties, she was given limited access to valuable pieces. For instance, during visits to countries like Tonga and Morocco, she was reportedly not provided with tiaras or other significant jewelry, a decision likely made out of concerns over trust and responsibility.
This lack of access is particularly striking considering the royal tradition of loaning precious items to family members for official events. It has been suggested that Queen Elizabeth, long before Meghan’s arrival, had replicas of the crown jewels made to ensure the originals were not at risk. Meghan’s reported cavalier attitude toward these items, however, may have led to restrictions on her access.
One particularly damaging rumor claims that Meghan wore a diamond bracelet and earrings to a wedding reception, pieces either gifted by Prince Charles or loaned by the Queen, which have allegedly not been seen since. Some speculate that these items were sold, a claim consistent with the accusations of Meghan’s supposed reckless behavior.
The issue of missing jewelry has not been limited to mere speculation. There have been discussions about discrepancies in the craftsmanship of earrings supposedly worn by Meghan compared to those once belonging to Princess Diana. These differences in quality have only added to the controversies surrounding Meghan’s time as a member of the royal family.
In the end, the saga of the missing bracelet and other alleged jewelry mishaps has further strained Meghan Markle’s already fraught relationship with the British royal family. The rumors, whether entirely true or exaggerated, have cast a long shadow over her time as a duchess, leaving many to question whether she fully grasped the responsibilities and significance of the treasures she was entrusted with.
